Emmanuella Kyei Manu
Emmanuella Kyei Manu

Photo by Vanessa Coleman

Kyei Manu is pronounced "Chay Mah-noo."

I am a PhD Candidate in the Department of Economics at Stanford University, advised by Peter J. Klenow and Melanie Morten.

My research is in macroeconomics and development economics. Before Stanford, I earned a bachelor's degree in economics from Princeton University and a master's degree in economics from the London School of Economics and Political Science.

I am on the job market for 2026/2027.

Link to my CV

Email: kyeimanu@stanford.edu

Working Papers

Migrant Networks and Climate Change · Job Market Paper

Migration as an adaptation strategy to climate change depends on whether people move in response to climate change and where they choose to relocate. A widespread finding in specific migration episodes is that people migrate to places with large diasporas — if this is an important force in international migration, it could also be key for climate adaptation. Using global migration and temperature data, we show that migrant networks mirror origin-country climate risk, and that adaptation through migration has been limited to date. We formalize the insurance value of networks in a model with climate-induced productivity shocks, showing that this value depends on the correlation between existing migrant networks and the spatial covariance of climate shocks. Theoretically, the net effect of network-driven migration on adaptation is ambiguous: history dependence slows reallocation to safer places, while network feedback can amplify moves to better ones.

Misallocation versus Inequality

A stream of research contends that input misallocation takes a toll on aggregate productivity. If this is true, then why does it persist? One answer could be that policies to mitigate misallocation exacerbate inequality. We explore this possibility using data on Indian manufacturing firms and households in a model with both heterogeneous firms and workers. We focus on size-dependent misallocation given the ample evidence for size-dependent policies in India. We find that abandoning such policies would boost aggregate manufacturing productivity by 1–4%, but would also raise the skill premium and overall inequality, since larger firms employ more skilled workers and earn more profits for their owners. We estimate that size-based reforms could lower consumption-equivalent welfare on the order of 9%. This suggests removing misallocation may be unpopular because it worsens consumption inequality.

Works in Progress

The Growth Implications of Heterogeneous Firm-to-Firm Knowledge Spillovers

Locality, Volatility, and Firm Dynamics in Developing Countries

Teaching

Stanford University

Teaching assistant for Econ 1: Principles of Economics

Princeton University

  • Economics tutor for McGraw Center for Teaching and Learning
  • Undergraduate course assistant for International Monetary Economics